Topics A to Z

As part of NEHA's continuos effort to provide convenient access to information and resources, we have gathered together for you the links in this section. Our mission is "to advance the environmental health and protection professional for the purpose of providing a healthful environment for all,” as well as to educate and inform those outside the profession.

Abstract

Consumer-generated restaurant review sites offer a wealth of information about dining options. These sites are based on consumers’ experiences; therefore, it is useful to assess the relevance between restaurant review (for food quality) and retail food facilities (RFFs) inspection results (for sanitation) from health departments. This study analyzed New York City restaurant ratings on Yelp.com to determine if there was a relationship to RFFs’ violation scores for those same facilities found on the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene web pages. In addition, we assessed differences between RFFs defined on Yelp as quick service versus full service, and chains versus nonchains. Yelp ratings were found to be correlated only with sanitation in chain RFFs.

June 2016
June 2016
78.10 | 8-12
Haeik Park, MS, Jooho Kim, MTA, Barbara Almanza, PhD, RD

Abstract

Recent outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases in the Americas indicate the need for the reinstatement of mosquito elimination efforts in the region. These efforts need to have buy-in from all governmental agencies within the region using a multidisciplinary effort with appropriate financial support.

September 2017
September 2017
80.2 | 26-27
Jennifer Ann Marie Calder, MPH, DVM, PhD, City of Stamford Department of Health, Columbia University

Abstract

Arsenic in well water is associated with risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and adverse pregnancy and childhood outcomes. More than 1 in 10 private water wells in New Hampshire contain arsenic concentrations exceeding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s maximum contaminant level of 10 µg/L arsenic. In July 2019, New Hampshire became the second state in the country to reduce the maximum contaminant level for arsenic in public water to 5 ppb through the signing into law of HB 261. Testing is the only way to identify whether well water contains arsenic, as arsenic is odorless, colorless, and tasteless; however, private well water testing often does not occur as recommended. Therefore, we sought to determine perspectives of pregnant women about testing their well water. We conducted three focus groups with a total of 12 mothers of young children. Most knew of the need to test for radon and some talked about fluoride but they had not been aware of the need to regularly test for arsenic in well water. Most reported that their healthcare providers had not asked them whether they had tested their water for arsenic; however, the mothers reported that they thought the recommendation would have motivated them to pursue testing. Other barriers included cost and perception of testing as a complicated and time-consuming task. In conclusion, rural mothers of young children are willing to test for arsenic in their well water if their healthcare providers recommend it.

 

October 2019
October 2019
82.3 | 26-32
Anna M. Adachi-Mejia, PhD, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Carolyn J. Murray, MPH, MD, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Margaret R. Karagas, PhD, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Additional Topics A to Z: Drinking Water

Pages